![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Home Latest News Search e-learning Calendars Contact Us Legal Issues |
Disability » LegislationLegislationDISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1995
(Source: The Disability Discrimination Act.1995. What Service Providers Need To Know) Legislation
Every day disabled people face difficulties that most non-disabled people have no idea about. Its not just about ramps, wide doorways and accessible toilets for wheelchair users. It's also about disabled people and the way they are treated. The Disability Discrimination Act aims to ensure that all service providers treat disabled customers as well as they treat everyone else. The Disability Discrimination Act gives disabled people rights in the areas of:
A phased approach has been taken to introducing the rights:
The Disability Discrimination Act applies to any business or organisation which:
Disability Definition
“a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long term adverse effect on a person's ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities”.
Normal day-to-day activities can be classified under the following headings:
The Act defines some-one with a disability under the Act as having ' a physical
or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on his/her
ability to carry out activities'.
Under The Act, someone who uses a wheelchair or has difficulty in walking; someone who is deaf; someone who has significantly impaired speech; someone who is blind or partially sighted; someone who has continuing treatment for diabetes; someone with epilepsy; someone who has a learning disability or someone who has a mental illness, could all be considered to be disabled. Also protected by the Act are people who have a severe disfigurement. Someone who was once disabled but has since recovered, such as someone who has recovered from a mental illness, is still protected. The Act also covers someone whose condition might initially have only a slight effect on their day-to-day activities, but is likely to get worse, such as people with cancer, HIV infection or multiple sclerosis.
Less Favourable Treatment You must not refuse to provide a service or deliberately avoid providing a service to someone who is disabled for any reason related to their disability. For example: A hairdresser would be breaking the law if they refused to make an appointment for someone with a severe facial disfigurement because they thought that other customers might be upset. You cannot refuse to provide a service to a disabled person because you think that another service provider may cater better for them. You could still be breaking the law, even if you think that you are being helpful to a disabled customer, by not providing a service for them. For example: You would be breaking the law if you were a solicitor's receptionist and refused to book an appointment for someone who is deaf because you thought that the person would be more comfortable at another solicitor's where one of the staff can understand sign language. You must not offer a disabled person a lower standard of service than you would offer other customers and you must not be less polite to a disabled person because of their disability. For example: Imagine you are a waiter in a busy café. Customers all around you are impatient to be served. At one table there are two disabled customers with their friends. Although you know they have been waiting the longest you decide to leave them until last because you know from previously that it will take longer to take their order. This would be giving them a lower standard of service. You cannot offer a disabled person worse terms than you would offer other people. You cannot, for example, charge more for the same service or restrict the way the service is used because of a person's disability. For example: A person with epilepsy is organising a social evening in the town hall for her local voluntary organisation. Normally rooms in the town hall can be booked without paying a deposit but in this case the manager decides to charge a deposit in case the person has a seizure and causes damage. This would be offering worse terms.
For example: A publican could refuse to serve a disabled customer because he is drunk and abusive. As long as the refusal is not because of the customer's disability, the publican is not breaking the law. Reasonable Adjustments You should consider whether your services are accessible to disabled people. You should anticipate their needs and the adjustments that may have to be made for them, rather than wait until a disabled person wants to use the service you provide. You must take reasonable steps to change your policies, practices and procedures, if they make it impossible or unreasonably difficult for disabled people to use your services. For example: A shop has a policy of not allowing dogs on its premises. It may be unlawful for the shop not to change this policy to allow an exception for disabled people accompanied by a guide dog or other assistance dog. You must make reasonable steps to provide a reasonable alternative method for making your services available to disabled people, where a physical feature makes it impossible or unreasonably difficult for them to use these services. For example: An independent cinema has a steep flight of stairs at its front entrance, making it impossible or unreasonably difficult for visitors with a mobility impairment to have access to the cinema. A side entrance for staff use only is fully accessible and always open. The cinema decides to allow disabled people to use this side entrance. You must also take reasonable steps to provide an auxiliary aid or service if that would enable or make it easier for disabled people to use your services. For example: A person with multiple sclerosis who uses a wheelchair visits her local insurance broker. The reception desk is too high for her to lean on to fill in a form so she is given a clipboard to rest the form on and is able to complete it.
Enforcement Remedies If a complaint is not resolved through internal complaints procedures, a service provider may be taken to court. Normally a case should be brought within 6 months of the alleged act of discrimination.
Northern Ireland Act 1998 - Section 75 and Schedule 9.
(Source: Equality Comission for Northern Ireland) Section 75 and Schedule 9 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998, came into force on 1 January 2000. Responsibility for these provisions lies with the Secretary of State. The provisions place a statutory obligation on public authorities (Northern Ireland departments, most non-departmental public bodies, District Councils and other bodies including UK departments designated by the Secretary of State) to carry out their functions relating to Northern Ireland with due regard to the need to promote equality of opportunity
In addition, without prejudice to this obligation, public authorities must have regard to the desirability of promoting good relations between persons of different religious belief, political opinion, or racial group
It also embraces limitations on rights which the ECHR included to cover unusual circumstances such as war or a public emergency, known legally as 'derogating' from the overall standard of protection, this applied in Northern Ireland where the exceptional level of violence led to limits on legal rights, such as allowing police to detain a terrorist suspect for up to five days without charge instead of the usual 48 hours.
Article 2 of Protocol 6 Death penalty in time of war. (Source: Human Rights Impact Leaflet. Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission
and Human Rights Act 1998 Chapter 42)
|
‘Working with
Diversity’ is not responsible for the content of external Internet
sites Northern Ireland Web Design by redrhino |